Understanding
Faith Together

What is the Multi-Religion Election System (Topp konfliktlösningsmodell)?

The Multi-Religion Election System is a Swedish term (Multireligionvalsystem) for the English Multi-Religion Election System (MRES). It is a reform based on research on the religious election, the Church Election, which is applied only in the Nordic countries such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. Hereinafter referred to as the Church Election Reform.

Through research and analysis of the Church Election, we found both advantages and disadvantages; however, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.

The Positive Aspects of the Church Election

• That only the Christian Protestant denominations have introduced democracy into their denominations through the church election, i.e. they have democratized their denominations.
• The church election has made it possible for a woman to become an archbishop.
• That only natives or those who have converted to Protestantism and have reached the age of 16 are allowed to practice democracy two years before the general election or the election to the European Parliament.

The Negative Aspects of the Church Election

• The church election is not applied among other faith communities such as Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus and others who are not Protestant. Nor is it applied among Christian Catholics and Orthodox who are Swedish citizens, even though these faith communities include people who have fled their countries and come as refugees to the Nordic countries and who oppose the introduction of democracy in their faith communities that the Nordic churches have introduced.
• These non-Protestant religious communities deprive their young members who have reached the age of 16 and attend the same high school as the 16-year-old Protestant students of the right to practice democracy two years before the general election or the election to the European Parliament.
• These denominations that are not Protestant also deprive their female members of the ability to become priests like those governed by the Pope.
• Those religious communities that have not introduced democracy into their religious communities, including the Protestant ones in the Nordic countries that have introduced democracy into their religious communities, have made it more difficult to separate the state from the church and religion from politics.
• The church election leads to exclusionary politics, when the parliamentary parties participate in the church election in which only native Protestants who have reached the age of 16 and who are members of the parliamentary parties' youth and student unions are allowed to participate and vote, while others end up outside, i.e. are not allowed to follow their party's lines.
• The negative consequence of the church election is that in the Swedish parliament there is a religious Christian party, KD, corresponding to the religious parties that are in the EU parliament and that make laws.
• Only a few countries within the EU, such as Sweden, Denmark and Finland, apply democracy in their religious communities, while other EU countries lack corresponding elections.
• These religious Christian parties provide great support to Israel, which prevents peace and in principle even a two-state solution. Accusations of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are increasing both in schools, religious education and even outside these areas.
• That a Syrian Orthodox woman abandoned her faith and converted to Protestantism in order to be accepted as a priest. The question is should all women convert or remain in their faiths and work to introduce democracy in these faiths.

The Goal of the Multi-Religion Election System (MRES)

The goal of the Multi-Religion Election System (MRES) is to introduce democracy in all religious communities without exception, starting with the Nordic countries that already have church elections within the EU and eventually in other countries, the USA, Israel, Iran, India, China, Great Britain, Germany, Brazil and France, etc. To achieve a complete separation between state and church and between religion and politics.

We start from the principle that it is democracy that has given all religious communities freedom of religion, and that democracy be introduced in all religions, without exception. A transition from church elections to a multi-religion election system in those countries that already have church elections. In other countries (USA, UK, China, India, Iran, Israel.....) that do not have similar elections, a multi-religion election system is introduced.

Core Values and Principles

Despite major differences between the Church Election and the Multi-Religion Election, they still have the same basic value: to introduce democracy into their religious communities and that those who have reached the age of 16 have the right to vote. This means that democracy is introduced into all religious communities, without exception.

• Modernization: A modernization of religious influence in Nordic democracy and religious neutrality.
• Democratic Framework: To replace the current church elections in the Nordic countries with a system that includes all faith communities on equal terms.
• Equal Representation: To create a more equal religious representation in a secular and multicultural society.
• Religious Neutrality: That the state should not treat any individual community differently, but give all religions the same democratic platform.

What is the difference between FRC, church meeting, synod, conclave, election of patriarch or parliament?

What is FRC and how is it chosen?

Read more about the FRC here →

The Faith Representatives Chamber (FRC) is elected through the Multi-Religion Election, which is the practical application of the Multi-Religion Election System.

Only the three positive parts of the church election are applied in the election of the FRC, which has been mentioned earlier. However, the FRC fundamentally improves upon the traditional church election model in several key ways:

• Universal Voting Rights: In the church election, only those who belong to the Nordic churches (Protestant denominations) who are 16 years of age and older are allowed to vote. The FRC expands the right to vote to include all Swedish citizens who have reached the age of 16, regardless of religion.
• True Gender Equality in Leadership: Unlike the church election, which allows only a Protestant woman to become an archbishop, the Multi-Religion Election includes all women, regardless of religion, having the same opportunity to be elected to the highest religious position.
• Democratizing All Faiths: Unlike the church election, which only makes it possible to democratize the Protestant faith communities in the Nordic countries, the Multi-Religion Election democratizes all religions without exception.
• Complete Separation of Church and State: The church election allows politicians and parliamentary parties to participate. These politicians are elected at the church council, which prevents the separation of state and church, and religion from politics. In contrast to the church election, the Multi-Religion Election prohibits parliamentary parties from participating, with the explicit goal of completing the separation of state and church, and religion and politics.